Below is a transcribed excerpt from one of Dr. DUI's recent radio broadcasts. If you are in need of an experienced Los Angeles DUI defense attorney, contact Dr. DUI - Okorie Okorocha.

So we talked about the breathalyzers a little bit.  The other thing is the breathalyzers report to measure deep lung air.  That’s air that exchanges with the blood deep in the lungs.  Now, we know this does not happen, and that’s a proven fact.  And a lot of these scientists that test this for the Department of Justice who get paid $100,000.00 a year, and I know ten times as much as they do.  Report to know more about chemistry and biology and give you this malarkey that it actually does that, or say that if it does it gives you a lower blood alcohol reading or full of it.

Oh, and by the way, they always claim to know they know everything about every drug.  This is ridiculous.  And drugs and their blood contents don’t have anything to do with mental impairment.

For example, the drug Xanax has an effective therapeutic dose for four hours.  It actually has an effectiveness of two hours.  Now, the actual blood half-life where the content in the blood goes to half is eight hours.  So you will have just about full dosing at eight hours.  It only goes to half at about eight and a half hours.

Well, the impairment was done four times as many hours ago.  And you don’t know how much a person took, and the blood levels depend drastically on the person.  It’s called pharmacokinetics.  That’s why we have pharmacists.  That’s why we have different doses of drugs for every single person.  That’s why we need pharmacists.  That’s why drugs and medications come in different doses.  Everybody’s not the same.  These machines everybody’s the same.

Okay, Cutmaster wants to know why I say don’t take any test in the field such as field sobriety tests unless you’re under 18 or on probation.  But you do take the breath test at the station.  In California you have to give the evidence.  You have to give the government tests just by having a driver’s license because driving’s a privilege, not a right.

Okay.  You’re going to do that, but you’re going to give them the crappiest test you can, right.  Give them the breath test.  Let me attack it.

Now, if you’re positive that you’re in good shape then take the blood test, but that’s still subject to scrutiny because there are bacteria that eat blood sugar and poop alcohol, and the preservative is only partially effective.  The preservative also has to be exact, which it never is, and it’s pre-done, and usually they order the tubes out of Colorado.  And when we have it retested we find it has too much preservative or too much blood, or it didn’t fully mix with the blood, and so you've got a disproportionate amount of alcohol.  And when we retest it we find out that you just have pure alcohol or it’s been compromised.

Now, the criminalists, no matter what you do, say, well, the blood sample was apparently compromised.  And they say that it was more effective when they did it.  Of course this is, again, malarkey.  These samples, if you can’t test them again why do they have you save the sample?  Why did the government do that?  There’s no need to save a sample for you to test – Cutmaster Callum’s holding up a sign that says so I can prove it’s malarkey.  Yes, that’s why they do it.  No, that’s not why they do it.

But they tell you you can test it.  And then when I have it tested and it comes back faulty, they go ahead and say, oh, well, it’s faulty.  Thank you.  I didn’t realize that.  So anyway, they tell me the sample that they gave me is no good.

So we’ve got to keep in mind these are bad samples, bad tests.  And if they were any good they would tell me that it’s not any good when I gave my blood for sampling.  But they don’t.  They wait until I get to a trial and then tell me they’re no good when I have it retested and I get a different result.

Now, biological samples, you never, ever just throw in a back of a police car in an evidence bag and go ahead and test two weeks later.  But that’s what they do with blood tests, and that’s what they tell you is accurate.  Well, that wouldn’t meet medical standards anywhere.  Anywhere.

That is so racist, Cutmaster.  Put that sign away.  He’s giving me countries where it would be acceptable.  Thank you.  No.  You ever been there?